And he's tackling a specific point made in the report.

"Since it has not been a year since it premiered, it hasn't been possible for  Animal Crossing Bells many kids to buy it, but for the moment it is a game with a consumer set that's likely different from the own expectations," he explained.

Nogami theorized that New Horizon's lesser than expected youth demographic could be because New Horizons has not yet been available during key holiday periods.

"Since it hasn't been a year since it was released, it hasn't been possible for many children to buy it, but for now it is a game with a user set that is likely different from the own expectations," he said.

I will move a little off the rails here, and wonder if that threw them for a significant loop. Would they prefer that this was primarily appreciated by kids? Kids (can be) more adapting and they certainly have a much smaller voice when it comes to feedback.

Fundamentally, will they attempt to appease their elderly audience (who showed up in droves) or even try to change to game to make it less appealing to adults and more (or only) appealing to kids?

For me personally it is not even that, it is the next onwards profiles have restricted abilities. This fuckin blows and stop me from becoming the match. Otherwise I would've loved to discuss an island with my little sister.

It is not ideal, but it really doesn't hamstring you like you think/people say.

Personally, I enjoy sharing the island with my wife and daughter. I certainly understand wanting you to yourself as well. As always, more options and flexibility are constantly better.

Yeah, if both players were equal owners and may"progress" the island evenly, it would be OK. I've got it and my daughter is your island proprietor so there is really nothing I could do unless she goes and does the quests. It is pretty stupid how they have it setup.

And he's tackling a specific point made in the report. Does he have to  buy Animal Crossing Items discuss every single topic prior to making a comment?